Reactions to Early Trump Foreign Policy Actions: What Americans Think

271

As President Donald Trump embarks on a distinctly different foreign policy strategy from his predecessor, President Joe Biden, Americans are weighing in on the outcomes. With significant shifts in international agreements, dealings with Russia, and economic policies such as tariffs on China, Americans have expressed mixed and, at times, negative views on his foreign policy actions. From the withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Paris Climate Agreement to dealings with Russia and Ukraine, the American public’s opinions on these changes have been largely skeptical.

A Shift in Foreign Policy

One of the most noticeable changes in Trump’s foreign policy has been his approach to international relations. Trump has steered the United States away from key global agreements, which has led to considerable backlash among many Americans. For instance, more Americans disapprove than approve of the U.S. withdrawing from the WHO and the Paris Climate Agreement. Similarly, ending USAID programs has not received positive reviews, with a majority of Americans skeptical about these decisions.

These early actions, coupled with his engagement with Russia and his handling of relations with Israel and Palestine, have sparked debates across the nation. A large portion of the public feels that Trump is favoring Russia too much, while his approach to Israeli and Palestinian relations has been met with mixed reactions.

Trump’s Relationship with Russia and Ukraine

Trump’s handling of the Russia-Ukraine conflict has been a point of contention. The survey revealed that 43% of Americans believe Trump is favoring Russia too much. Despite some efforts to mediate and broker a ceasefire between the two countries, the public perception is that his administration’s stance tilts too far in Russia’s favor.

In contrast, 30% of Americans feel that Trump is striking the right balance between the two countries, while only a very small portion (3%) believe he is favoring Ukraine over Russia. This divide becomes even more apparent when political party lines are drawn: Republicans tend to approve of Trump’s approach, with 57% believing he’s handling the situation correctly, while 72% of Democrats think he’s leaning too heavily towards Russia.

A Divided Opinion on Israeli and Palestinian Relations

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been another area where Trump’s foreign policy has drawn mixed responses. While very few Americans (3%) think Trump is favoring Palestinians too much, the public is divided on whether he is favoring Israel too much or if he’s striking the right balance. About 31% of Americans believe he is giving too much favor to Israel, while 29% believe he’s balancing the situation appropriately.

This issue is again deeply divided along party lines. Republicans, especially, are more likely to support Trump’s stance, with 51% saying he is striking the right balance, while Democrats are more critical, with 50% saying he is favoring Israel too much.

Territorial Ambitions: Greenland and Gaza

Trump’s controversial statements about Greenland and Gaza have sparked mixed reactions from the American public. In the case of Greenland, which Trump once proposed the U.S. should take over, 54% of Americans oppose this idea, with 43% strongly disapproving. Despite the significant opposition, about 41% of Republicans supported the idea, though a substantial portion, 31%, were unsure.

Similarly, Trump’s proposal regarding Gaza has not been met with favor. 62% of Americans oppose the U.S. taking over Gaza, including 49% who strongly oppose it. Again, Republicans tend to support the idea more than Democrats, with 27% of Republicans in favor of it compared to just 5% of Democrats.

Economic Measures: Tariffs on China

Trump’s trade policies, particularly the increased tariffs on China, have been another key element of his foreign policy agenda. The American public is largely negative about the tariffs’ impact, with 52% saying they will be bad for the U.S. and 53% believing they will harm them personally. While a portion of Republicans sees the tariffs as beneficial for the U.S., they are less convinced about the personal benefits, with 30% of Republicans fearing the tariffs will negatively affect them personally.

On the other hand, Democrats are overwhelmingly critical of the tariffs. 80% of Democrats believe the tariffs will be bad for the country, and 75% say the tariffs will harm them personally. There is a significant divide between how each party perceives the trade policies, reflecting the polarized nature of Trump’s approach.

The Youth vs. Older Generations: Differing Views on Trump’s Foreign Policy

When looking at public opinions across age groups, older Americans tend to approve more of Trump’s foreign policy actions than younger generations. For example, those aged 50 and older are more likely to support leaving the Paris Climate Agreement, with 40% approving compared to just 24% of those under 30. Similarly, older Republicans are much more supportive of Trump’s foreign policy decisions, particularly in terms of withdrawing from international agreements and increasing tariffs on China.

Public Support for Withdrawal from the WHO and Paris Agreement

Among the major shifts in U.S. foreign policy, the withdrawal from the WHO and the Paris Climate Agreement have garnered substantial negative reactions. While 64% of Republicans support ending USAID programs, only 9% of Democrats agree. Similarly, the decision to leave the Paris Climate Agreement and the WHO is far more supported by Republicans, with 60% of Republicans supporting the former and 58% supporting the latter, while the approval from Democrats is significantly lower.

Conclusion: A Divided Nation on Trump’s Foreign Policy

As Trump continues to pursue a foreign policy agenda that sharply contrasts with that of his predecessors, the American public is split on the effectiveness and appropriateness of his decisions. From relations with Russia to economic trade measures and territorial ambitions, Trump’s foreign policy actions have sparked both support and criticism. Republicans tend to favor his approach, particularly in areas like trade tariffs and dealings with Russia, while Democrats express skepticism, particularly regarding the withdrawal from international agreements and the handling of foreign conflicts.

As the situation continues to evolve, the American public’s mixed response suggests a need for continued debate and consideration on the long-term implications of Trump’s foreign policy. Whether or not these early actions will have lasting effects on the U.S.’s global standing remains to be seen, but it is clear that the nation remains divided on how these foreign policy shifts should be implemented.

Author Profile

Syed Tahir Abbas Shah

Syed Tahir Abbas is a Master's student at Southwest University, Chongqing, specializing in international relations and sustainable development. His research focuses on U.S.-China diplomacy, global geopolitics, and the role of education in shaping international policies. Syed has contributed to academic discussions on political dynamics, economic growth, and sustainable energy, aiming to offer fresh insights into global affairs.

Latest entries

• Global DiplomacyJune 7, 2025Trump Announces New Round of US-China Trade Talks: What’s at Stake?
• Climate and CultureJune 5, 2025Intensifies Heat Safety Measures as 2025 Hajj Begins in Saudia
• Criminal JusticeJune 2, 2025How Trump and Bukele Are Crushing Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s Fight for Justice
• Global SecurityJune 1, 2025US Sends New Nuclear Deal Proposal to Iran Amid Rising Uranium Tensions