Table of Contents
In recent years, the United States has witnessed a concerning shift in federal policies that echo the discredited ideologies of eugenics. Under the leadership of President Donald Trump, figures like Elon Musk and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have introduced initiatives that prioritize certain populations over others, often at the expense of the disabled, the elderly, and the poor. These developments raise critical questions about the direction of American governance and its commitment to equality and human rights.
The Rise of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)
Elon Musk’s involvement in the Trump administration led to the creation of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a body aimed at reducing federal spending. While cost-cutting can be beneficial, DOGE’s actions have had far-reaching consequences. One of its most controversial moves was the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which had long been instrumental in providing global aid and combating diseases. Critics argue that this decision jeopardizes the lives of millions who relied on USAID’s programs.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Controversial Health Policies
As Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has implemented policies that many view as regressive and discriminatory. Notably, he has authorized the creation of a national database using Medicare and Medicaid data to investigate the causes of autism. While understanding autism is important, the methods and rhetoric employed have raised alarms. Kennedy’s past statements linking vaccines to autism, despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary, further exacerbate concerns about his approach to public health. Fierce Healthcare+3Reuters+3Truthout+3
The Influencee of Long-term
A philosophical concept known as “longtermism” has gained traction among some policymakers and tech leaders. This ideology emphasizes the importance of safeguarding humanity’s future, even if it means making difficult decisions in the present. However, critics argue that long-termism can be used to justify harmful policies that marginalize vulnerable populations under the guise of protecting future generations. The alignment of long-termist thinking with current federal policies raises ethical concerns about whose lives are deemed valuable.
Implications for Society
The integration of eugenicist ideas into federal policy threatens to erode the principles of inclusivity and equal opportunity. By prioritizing efficiency and long-term survival over the well-being of all citizens, these policies risk marginalizing those who are already disadvantaged. It’s imperative for society to critically assess these developments and advocate for policies that uphold the dignity and rights of every individual.
Author Profile
- Syed Tahir Abbas is a Master's student at Southwest University, Chongqing, specializing in international relations and sustainable development. His research focuses on U.S.-China diplomacy, global geopolitics, and the role of education in shaping international policies. Syed has contributed to academic discussions on political dynamics, economic growth, and sustainable energy, aiming to offer fresh insights into global affairs.
Latest entries
Education PolicyMay 29, 2025Impact of Trump Administration’s Crackdown on Chinese Students
Canadian PoliticsMay 27, 2025Canada’s 2025 Election: A Shifting Political Landscape
Disability RightsMay 25, 2025From Fringe to Federal: How Eugenicist Thinking is Shaping U.S. Policy
Immigration PolicyMay 24, 2025What’s Normal, What’s Not, About ODNI’s Request to Revise the NIC’s Intelligence Assessment